On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 11:43:38PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 09:38:18PM -0800, Graham Percival wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 01:16:43AM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > > > Both patches look suitable, but I'd like to take a look at replacing > > > > vdupq_laneq_u32 in non-aarch64. [snip discussion of the A64-specific intrinsics] > > We're not going to rush to get arm32 + aes working for the spiped 1.6.2 > > release, but I'd be happy to collaborate on enabling this for the following > > version of spiped, if you can test them. > > > > The same applies to the GNU/Hurg SO_REUSEADDR thing. Unless it's a trivial > > fix (or the problem exists on other operating systems), it's probably not > > going to happen before 1.6.2, but I'm happy to work on that afterwards. > > For the record, the attached patch fixes the two problems on the > GNU/Hurd - they are both related to Unix-domain (AF_LOCAL) sockets. > It seems that the Hurd pflocal translator does not fully implement > everything one might want to do via the BSD sockets API; some of that > may be seen in IRC logs, such as the first entry (2013-09-19) at > https://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/hurd/translator/pflocal.html - > somebody asks specifically about SO_REUSEADDR and the answer is > "is that of interest at all?" There is a fuller log at > http://richtlijn.be/~larstiq/hurd/hurd-2013-09-19 but it seems that > this particular conversation was not continued. > > So about this particular Hurd patch... TBH, I would completely understand > if you do not feel like accepting it; there would be no problem for me > to carry it as a Debian-specific patch in the Debian package or even, > if you are strongly opposed to that (some upstream developers are, for > various reasons, some of them valid), I could just leave things as they > are. FTR, this is not a case of "it has compiled/worked before and it > does not work now"; I don't think I remember ever being able to > successfuly compile and run spiped on the Hurd for various other reasons. > FWIW, I have not included this patch in a Debian package upload yet. OK, so I could have checked before writing :) It turns out that spiped versions before 1.6.0 did work on the Hurd: https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=spiped&arch=hurd-i386 ...but again, I would completely understand if this is not a priority for the upstream developers. G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@debian.org pp@storpool.com PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature