[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: using fsck in a lowmem environment

To: Colin Percival <cperciva@tarsnap.com>
Subject: Re: using fsck in a lowmem environment
From: Arthur Chance <freebsd@qeng-ho.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 10:30:53 +0000
Cc: tarsnap-users@tarsnap.com
In-reply-to: <4EC61F3D.4030104@tarsnap.com>
References: <CAAicRrHTyO=TMyfWkbjdWd61eqoiT7THh7NP7dRbCf-qFf0raA@mail.gmail.com> <4EC61F3D.4030104@tarsnap.com>

On 11/18/11 09:02, Colin Percival wrote:
[big snip]

and most
people have more than enough RAM based on the amount of data they're
storing.

Is there a formula for how much RAM is needed for a given amount ofbacked up data?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: using fsck in a lowmem environment
  - From: Colin Percival <cperciva@tarsnap.com>

References:
- using fsck in a lowmem environment
  - From: Mark Smith <mark@bumptechnologies.com>
- Re: using fsck in a lowmem environment
  - From: Colin Percival <cperciva@tarsnap.com>

Prev by Date: Re: using fsck in a lowmem environment
Next by Date: Re: using fsck in a lowmem environment
Previous by thread: Re: using fsck in a lowmem environment
Next by thread: Re: using fsck in a lowmem environment
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread