[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ipv6 and 1.0.34

To: Michael Stevens <mstevens@etla.org>
Subject: Re: ipv6 and 1.0.34
From: Colin Percival <cperciva@tarsnap.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2013 22:18:59 -0700
Cc: tarsnap-users@tarsnap.com
In-reply-to: <20130714212120.GB7455@ceres.etla.org>
References: <20130714212120.GB7455@ceres.etla.org>

On 07/14/13 14:21, Michael Stevens wrote:
> Just installed 1.0.34 on a couple of machines with ipv6 connectivity.
> 
> It seems to be working so far, but I'd be interested to hear how much
> ipv6 traffic tarsnap ends up getting in general.

Indeed, I was thinking of publishing those statistics (possibly as a graph of
%ipv6 over time).  But you'll have to wait for some data to arrive -- right now
I imagine most of the ipv6 traffic is from a single user who started testing
tarsnap ipv6 code a few weeks ago.

-- 
Colin Percival
Security Officer Emeritus, FreeBSD | The power to serve
Founder, Tarsnap | www.tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly paranoid

References:
- ipv6 and 1.0.34
  - From: Michael Stevens <mstevens@etla.org>

Prev by Date: ipv6 and 1.0.34
Next by Date: How is the cache directory supposed to be setup?
Previous by thread: ipv6 and 1.0.34
Next by thread: How is the cache directory supposed to be setup?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread