[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Glacier Storage

To: tarsnap-users@tarsnap.com
Subject: Re: Glacier Storage
From: Robie Basak <rb@truebluelogic.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 01:39:57 +0000
In-reply-to: <20150222225127.GA25896@athena.barrera.io>
References: <20150222061426.GA28258@athena.barrera.io> <54EA3487.4070300@tarsnap.com> <20150222225127.GA25896@athena.barrera.io>

On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 07:51:27PM -0300, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
> What I had is mind is something like "Backup up 200G of photos that I have in
> my home NAS. I'll only want these if my NAS blows up, which will hopefully be
> never."

git-annex works well with Amazon Glacier for this purpose. What you lose
compared to Tarsnap is whole-archive duplication. For photos though, it
should work fine, as it effectively deduplicates individual files that
never change since it's content addressed (it uses a hash).

References:
- Glacier Storage
  - From: Hugo Osvaldo Barrera <hugo@barrera.io>
- Re: Glacier Storage
  - From: Colin Percival <cperciva@tarsnap.com>
- Re: Glacier Storage
  - From: Hugo Osvaldo Barrera <hugo@barrera.io>

Prev by Date: Re: Glacier Storage
Next by Date: Re: Glacier Storage
Previous by thread: Re: Glacier Storage
Next by thread: Re: Glacier Storage
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread