[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Expected deduplication doesn't take place
- To: Colin Percival <cperciva@tarsnap.com>
- Subject: Re: Expected deduplication doesn't take place
- From: Igor Ostapenko <igor.ostapenko@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 12:04:30 +0200
- Cc: tarsnap-users@tarsnap.com
- In-reply-to: <000001525ddc88b9-c4e16eb2-1594-41b4-b270-351931e73bd6-000000@email.amazonses.com>
- Openpgp: id=FDD1E68BAB02BCB54B587C686604BB2A48FE9F99
- References: <569DFDF5.10408@gmail.com> <00000152592cfc9e-f40fe2e4-8fb1-4bfa-bf1e-896c034d9516-000000@email.amazonses.com> <569E1A94.1040507@gmail.com> <000001525b62c00f-810e550a-d311-40fe-a1c4-8f4d8d3de279-000000@email.amazonses.com> <569EA8D7.4070105@gmail.com> <000001525ddc88b9-c4e16eb2-1594-41b4-b270-351931e73bd6-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Colin Percival wrote on 20/01/2016 09:08:
> On 01/19/16 13:21, Igor Ostapenko wrote:
>> Colin Percival wrote on 19/01/2016 21:35:
>>> The unique compressed data is 622 MB in both cases. Are you sure that
>>> you didn't delete .test.daily.20160119104958 before you ran tarsnap
>>> again to create .test.daily.20160119105034 ?
>>
>> The second run was invoked right after the first one. There were no
>> deletion. Actually, write-only key is used in this situation.
>
> That's very strange. Are you sure you weren't doing a dry run?
Yeah... You're absolutely right, the script who is responsible for daily
backuping has --dry-run within.
I'm sorry for the hassle.