[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Question about mitigating large storage costs in case of ransomware

To: Jamie Landeg-Jones <jamie@catflap.org>
Subject: Re: Question about mitigating large storage costs in case of ransomware
From: Rob Hoelz <rob@hoelz.ro>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 14:09:55 -0400
Cc: tarsnap-users@tarsnap.com
In-reply-to: <201707121454.v6CEsusc049810@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net>
References: <20170712093639.440f9300@pyxis> <201707121454.v6CEsusc049810@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net>

On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 15:54:56 +0100
Jamie Landeg-Jones <jamie@catflap.org> wrote:

> Actually, re-reading your message, I now think I misunderstood, and
> you want to limit the size of the individual virtual archive, rather
> than the literal size of data-transfered?
> 
> J.
> 

That's correct!

-Rob

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question about mitigating large storage costs in case of ransomware
  - From: ac@c4909627.myzen.co.uk
- Re: Question about mitigating large storage costs in case of ransomware
  - From: ac@c4909627.myzen.co.uk

References:
- Question about mitigating large storage costs in case of ransomware
  - From: Rob Hoelz <rob@hoelz.ro>
- Re: Question about mitigating large storage costs in case of ransomware
  - From: Jamie Landeg-Jones <jamie@catflap.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Question about mitigating large storage costs in case of ransomware
Next by Date: Re: Question about mitigating large storage costs in case of ransomware
Previous by thread: Re: Question about mitigating large storage costs in case of ransomware
Next by thread: Re: Question about mitigating large storage costs in case of ransomware
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread