[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Please test tarsnap 1.0.37
> On Mar 8, 2016, at 2:35 AM, Colin Percival <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 03/07/16 05:04, Shinnok wrote:
>>> On Mar 2, 2016, at 2:54 AM, Colin Percival <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>> A potential version 1.0.37 of the Tarsnap client code is ready for testing.
>> It would help to tag alpha versions in Github or tag with the final 1.0.37.
>> With the latter if regressions are found it's simple to retag with git.
> I didn't want to tag anything yet in case someone saw "1.0.37" and thought
> that it was released.
I see the 1.0.37 tagged on 71b3f4e:
However after checkout and autoreconf && rebuild:
$ack -lc 1.0.36-head | head
Shouldn't the tagged head have those files use the new version?