sön 2012-11-18 klockan 00:12 +0200 skrev Peter Pentchev: > Wow... I haven't taken a look at your packaging yet, but it seems that > there has been a bit of a duplication of effort :) I filed a Debian > ITP (intent to package) bug on the same day spiped came out, and I'm > almost ready with my package at http://gitorious.org/spiped/spiped :) > (in general, an ITP bug in Debian is the proper way to notify others that > somebody's working on a package, so that there's no duplication of work :) Hey, that ITP wasn't there when I looked a week or so ago :) The reason I myself didn't file a ITP was that I wanted something to show before making any noice, not having done any previous Debian packaging. Seems like the main difference being that you applied patches while I applied workarounds. Instead of 01-honor-destdir.patch I went with BINDIR=$$(pwd)/debian/spiped/usr/bin Instead of 02-honor-compiler-flags.patch I put the CPPFLAGS within the CFLAGS as well as used LDADD_EXTRA for the LDFLAGS. I have no equivalent to 03-warnings.patch nor to 04-debian-build.patch. // Andreas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part