ons 2012-11-21 klockan 16:59 -0800 skrev Colin Percival: > On 11/18/12 08:56, Andreas Olsson wrote: > > For the stuff I created under ./debian/ I assigned a MIT/Expat license[1]. > > Will that do, or do you want me to explicitly contribute back under the > > two-clause BSD? > > I'd prefer two-clause BSD, just for the sake of having all the bits I > distribute under the same license and keeping things simple. @Colin: True, keeping things simple is a good is a good thing. I've now put my ./debian/ folder additions under the two-clause BSD. https://github.com/andreaso/spiped-debian/commit/e9ce4793c078ff9389cac998b7e362f49beeba13 @Peter: How are things coming on your end? Any thoughts on the difference in packaging? Another possibly noteworthy difference being that I settled for depending on debhelper 8, making it easier to also backport/build the package for Debian Stable (6.0). Anything in particular in this case missing by not using debhelper 9? // Andreas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part